This revolver proved easily managed with. 357 Magnum, and for those. But I really love then 10mm/40 cal combo.There is no denying the power advantage of the. But as a Ride the River Gun with, I would go with the Revolver too. Im keeping it that way unless they ban Semi auto here in California then I would most likely buy a Ruger Match Champion 10mm. I only own 2 firearms, a Ruger GP 100 4.2 inch 357 magnum and a Glock 20sf 10mm.
Interestingly enough, I was shooting fairly flat. After 3-4 shots, I hit the can, much to my amazement. After a cease fire I set up another can at about 100 yards and went back to the car and proceeded to shoot, resting on the hood of the car. The NXS is equipt with a 4 hammer-forged precision barrel with.
Muzzle blast was much less offensive than with the 3.5-inch-barrel Sheriff’s revolver. Some groups were less than 1.5 inches at 25 yards. Ammo out of it.Firing from the bench, the 4.75-inch-barrel Pietta revolver was the most accurate handgun tested. I know for a fact that I could not have made this with my CZ, eventhough that has darn good accuracy in its own right.FWIW, a guy I know at the range told me his brother, who was a cop, used the S&W Model 66 in their revolver competitions, as it was the most consistent performer with both. 22 is the most accurate long range handgun cartridge or not. Anyway, so my question is whether or not anyone would think that the.
One of the most accurate handguns on the market, the Legion sports Sig Sauers specialty Electro-Optics X-RAY sights for high visibility day and.I live in Paraguay, south america, and our supply of guns is very limited, but our local IMHSA team beats the ones from Brazil and Argentina, sometimes shooting perfect scores up to 200 m with very normal S&W 686, 8 3/8" revolvers. Bowen, with chambers bored in alignment with the barrel while mounted on the frame, just like the Freedom Arms, probably the most accurate (long range) out of the box handguns in the world, and got pretty close to MOA.Accuracy. He had one revolver built on a ruger frame by H. The revolvers were ussually 357, 44mag, or sometimes less powerfull, the the trick being perfect alignment of chambers, good ammo (most of the time pretty hot), good barrel, and good relationship of the nonrifled portion to bore size.
The next thing he knew, he woke up in a hospital, where he was told he almost bought the proverbial farm.The ensuing investigation showed that witnesses placed the shooters a mile away (by map). He got to the phone and did pass out. At first he suspected a wasp, but by the time he got to the bottom of the ladder, he felt sick and that he was going to pass out. No one got a license tag, but they only fired a few shots, then got in their car and took off.A mile away, this fellow was doing some work on his house, cleaning gutters, and felt a sharp stabbing "sting" in his back. 22LR round fired from a mile away by some kids shooting what appeared to be (according to witnesses) a handgun with a longish barrel, perhaps a Ruger 6-inch auto. They also have great success with long barreled (10"), out of the box 22's like the Brownings and High Standard.I knew a fellow who was hit by a.
You can take a Ruger Mark II and use it for self defense or for plinking. 22 is a wholly unthreatening gun to shoot. That he said it was like a "very bad" wasp sting indicates that he immediately knew he was in trouble.Now how does this relate to 100-yard shooting? Simple. Had the paramedics not arrived and rendered medical assistance, my friend would have died.I don't know how many of you have had very bad wasp stings, but they're not something you want to experience. 22 round fired by a pistol could have been so deadly.
You can fill the air with a great deal of lead with one, just like a shotgun however, if I were going to be air-dropped into a remote territory with only one gun and several thousand rounds of ammo, it would be a Ruger. 22 is in many ways the perfect survival gun. 357 magnum - the second greatest round of all time. But the best caliber of all for shooting at a hundred yards is, in my view, the. And I've broken my share of clay pigeons at 100 yards.
And when I put five shots into the cylinder to see if she was flinching, I saw that she wasn't.Now here's the kicker. 38 rounds, but got mixed results at the greater distances but when we switched to some of my handloaded 125gr JHP magnum rounds, I was surprised to see her actually connecting. (Not bad for a new shooter!) But she soon tired of the diminutive cartridge and wanted something a little stouter. She was soon kicking up dirt all around the clay pigeons and occasionally hitting them. I took his wife, who had never fired a handgun, over and started her off with. 454 Casull, a gun and ammo I wanted no part of.
My buddy and his friends, however, returned with bruised hands and a flinching problem. We had a great day and lots of gun. But the shorter barrel, with the right breathing and stance, was surprisingly good. With a 6-inch barrel, the front sight seemed to be all over the place and it did not inspire confidence. I theorized that the shorter sight radius was easier for us to draw a bead on. I'd always thought of it as a weak sister to the other barrel lengths, but we both did very well.
44, but for a hundred yards, make my caliber the. I've heard the oft-told story of Elmer Keith's 600-yard shot with the. 44 Magnum (a nickel S&W 29) wasn't nearly as accurate as I had hoped, but it came close to the targets and hit its share.
Then again, a particular brand of. 22 lr round may perform with splendid accuracy in a S & W Model 41 but not so well in a cheap Colt SAA knockoff. When those three are thrown together it becomes very hard to predict which will outperform which. When you think about accuracy you're thinking of, at minimum three variables: (1) the gun (2) the round fired and (3) the shooter.
Why, for example, should a. If the bullet mates correctly with the gun through which it fires, it should perform well. There are just too many variables at play.Moreover, there is no reason why any particular caliber should be more accurate. So, trying to predict which caliber is inherently more accurate is, in my opinion, an exercise in futility. And, finally, who's doing the shooting makes all the difference in the world.
The larger the bullet, the less it is affected by outside forces, both in and out of the barrel. Tilting barrel, etc.) and focusing only on which calibers are most accurate at 100yards +, he answer is.The reasons is basically mass. And that's not what is being asked, even if the OP thinks it is!:DLeaving aside the human element, and those mechanical factor dependant on the handgun construction (chamber alignment, fixed vs. And most folks confuse the hell out of them and answer with which gun they shoot best, or have seen shot best. 40 S & W? I can think of no logical reason why that would be so.There are several factors involved when you ask which caliber is most accurate.
The pistol is very accurate. When you even out all the factors, it is generally the bigger bores that are more accurate, overall.Now, if you want to look at all the "hand rifles", & Contenders, and compare them against more traditional handguns, or just look at conventional pistols and revolvers and want to know which is the most accurate at 100yds+, you should ask a different question.:rolleyes:And, when you add in the human element, well, that's a whole 'nother question again!The most accurate handgun at 100 yards is probably the most accurate gun at 25 yards?I shoot bullseye (among other things) and have a S&W M41 (.22 long rifle). 45 slug rumbles over it, without giving it any notice.
22 lr won't topple a ram at 500 yards - but that doesn't affect accuracy per se.Yeah, I'd go with a 'one-hand rifle' as the most accurate. The bullet must also knock over a target at the given range. Larger calibers and heavier bullets tend to drift less.Silhouette shooters have more to consider than basic accuracy. 22 long rifle at 'extreme' range is wind drift. It is extremely accurate as well.The problem with the. 45 ACP which was worked by the late Jimmy Clark.
I have several Contenders that I regularly shoot to 300 yards with handloads ( but honestly. 45 wadcutter isn't overwhelming in horsepower.OK. 45 ACP, I could hit pretty well at 100 yards with it, but the. But, as I mentioned, that also considers usable power at range.Skipping back to my Clark built.
0 kommentar(er)
